This research aims to inform the public about the prohibitions and obligations applicable to Swiss citizens and companies involved in armed conflicts abroad, particularly in the context of cyber warfare and disinformation operations. It also examines compliance with international humanitarian law and the law of neutrality.
In the context of current international conflicts, questions concerning the enlistment of Swiss nationals, particularly dual nationals, in foreign armed forces are attracting growing attention.
This research project examines the legal prohibitions and obligations applicable to Swiss citizens and companies involved in armed conflicts abroad. It addresses these issues through the lens of Swiss military criminal law, the law of neutrality, and international humanitarian law, while taking into account contemporary transformations in warfare, including the privatisation of military activities, the development of cyber operations, the use of intelligence services, and the proliferation of armed entities whose organisation no longer corresponds to the traditional model of the state military.
The first, completed strand focuses on the prohibition preventing Swiss nationals from serving in foreign armed forces. It builds on Thierry Godel’s monograph, L’interdiction pour les Suisses de servir dans des forces armées étrangères, published by Weblaw in 2023. The book analyses the case law relating to Article 94 of the Swiss Military Criminal Code, which, subject to authorisation by the Federal Council, criminalises the entry of a Swiss national into the service of a foreign army. It examines in particular the concepts of “foreign army” and “military service”, as well as their interpretation in Swiss military case law.
This research highlights the difficulties involved in applying criteria developed on the basis of the classical model of an organised and hierarchical army. In particular, it questions whether subordination to a military or “quasi-military” command should remain the defining element of foreign military service in the context of cyber conflicts, decentralised armed networks, and new forms of civilian participation in the war effort. The study therefore proposes consideration of a more functional criterion based on “active participation in the military effort”, which could more effectively capture contemporary forms of involvement in armed conflict.
The second strand, which is ongoing and is being developed in an article by Thierry Godel and Ana Carla Farrèr Gonçalves, extends the analysis to private military and security companies. The article examines the relationship between the law of neutrality and the obligation to respect and ensure respect for international humanitarian law arising from Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions. It also considers the extent to which neutrality-related obligations and national policies of non-participation shape the legal framework applicable to private military and security companies, influence their activities, and structure their internal compliance mechanisms.
Particular attention is paid to Switzerland, whose permanent neutrality has contributed to the development of a specific legal framework governing both individual participation in foreign armed forces and the provision of private security services abroad from Swiss territory. The analysis focuses in particular on corporate activities, the conduct of company personnel, cyber operations, intelligence services, and the challenges associated with the extraterritorial application of Swiss law.